Foundations & Sources

The CARE Transition Protocol is built on established research traditions in child development. This page lists the primary literatures CARE draws on, what each contributes to the Protocol — and, just as important, what CARE is and isn't.

The research traditions CARE draws on

Attachment and the security of predictable care

Decades of attachment research show that children build security from predictable, responsive caregiving — and that this security travels with them between environments. CARE's core premise, continuity of care across two households, comes from here.

John Bowlby, Attachment and Loss (three volumes: Attachment, 1969; Separation, 1973; Loss, 1980)
Mary Ainsworth, Mary Blehar, Everett Waters & Sally Wall, Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation (1978)

Predictability and children's stress-response systems

Developmental research on stress physiology finds that predictable environments and supportive adult presence buffer children's stress responses, while chronic unpredictability keeps them activated. This is why CARE treats transitions as nervous-system events — and why the same four fields, filled the same way every time, is the whole design.

Megan Gunnar & Karina Quevedo, “The Neurobiology of Stress and Development,” Annual Review of Psychology (2007)

Co-regulation: children settle through connected adults

Edward Tronick's “still-face” studies (1978) and his mutual regulation model showed how directly young children's emotional states track the responsiveness of their caregivers. CARE's regulation lens — including the principle that co-regulation precedes correction — applies this work to the handoff.

What actually harms children in divorce: conflict exposure

The divorce-outcomes literature consistently finds that children's adjustment tracks their exposure to interparental conflict more closely than family structure itself. That finding is CARE's reason for existing: a communication format that moves information without moving conflict.

E. Mavis Hetherington & John Kelly, For Better or For Worse: Divorce Reconsidered (2002)
Paul Amato's meta-analytic research on children and divorce (1991; 2001)
John Grych & Frank Fincham's cognitive-contextual framework for how children process interparental conflict (1990)

What CARE is — and isn't

CARE applies the principles above to one practical problem: the custody handoff. It is an organizational and communication tool — it is not a clinical instrument, has not been the subject of its own clinical trials, and is not therapy or legal advice. Professionals should apply their own judgment in how they use it, and families with safety concerns should work through legal channels, not a Snapshot.

Item added to your cart